howtothings.co.uk

BF2 and COD look the same to me?

(06-07-2010, 02:03 AM)Christopha Wrote: [ -> ]Just watched those videos, and I found the bottom to be more impressive. =/

HOW? He missed twice and it wasn't nearly as fantastic a shot as the one above. You can hardly see the guy in that one

(06-07-2010, 06:07 PM)T3hRogue Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-07-2010, 02:03 AM)Christopha Wrote: [ -> ]Just watched those videos, and I found the bottom to be more impressive. =/

HOW? He missed twice and it wasn't nearly as fantastic a shot as the one above. You can hardly see the guy in that one

Because its harder to pull off in MW 2 then in CoD 4.

Not really. COD4 had better players.

(06-07-2010, 07:26 PM)T3hRogue Wrote: [ -> ]Not really. COD4 had better players.

Can't argue with that. :p

I have changed my decision..I like BF:BC 2 10x more than MW 2..

Why?

No fucking noob tubers everywhere, when you get a sniper kill you don't get called a camper, because well..that's how everyone plays when sniping..And..all I did was snipe on the game, and I love it..MOVE OUT OF THE WAY INTERVENTION, HERE COMES THE M24!

Well I like both of them and I usually playing them. But I just want to say that COD is a single player game where they added a multiplayer. But I think that the single player will be great but when that's done you won't spend many hours on the multiplayer. And BFBC is a multplayer with a single player added.

He got it right on the (red) dot!

Other way around there mate:

BFBC has a decent campaign with an alright multiplayer (I enjoy it because it's different)
COD on the other hand (or at least MW2) was a multiplayer from the outset, exactly the same as MW1 turned out

Sharn, that is wrong. Battlefield has always been primarily multiplayer: Battlefield 1944 and 2 are prime examples

COD has always been single player with add-on. COD2's online was ghastly but the story was brilliant. It's the same all the way up the chain. All the CODs focus on solo rather than onl,ine - exception being MW2 which they fucked up